MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3047298366 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-a64

Abstract A64: Functional genomics of metastatic Ewing sarcoma

2020· article· en· W3047298366 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wajih Jawhar, Paul Waterhouse, Rama Khokha, Takeaki Ishii, Robert Turcotte, Nada Jabado, Livia Garzia

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsertional mutagenesisFLI1BiologyCancer researchMetastasisFusion genePrimary tumorSarcomaETS transcription factor familyTranscription factorTransduction (biophysics)Functional genomicsGeneGeneticsGenomicsGenomeCancerMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a poorly differentiated bone and soft tissue tumor of high metastatic potential. ES mainly affects children, adolescents, and young adults (AYAs) at a frequency of ~1.5 cases per million globally. Ewing neoplasms strikingly converge on a single recurrent initiating event, which is a chromosomal translocation that generates a fusion transcript between the EWSR1 gene and a gene of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly FLi1 (85%). After 20 years since the discovery of the EWS-FLi1 fusion, ES remains a clinical challenge with unacceptably low survival rates, primarily due to metastasis. The bulk of research conducted to date (>95%) being focused on the primary tumor has resulted in a critical knowledge gap. To address this issue and unravel the dysregulated pathways in ES tumor evolution and metastatic dissemination, we harnessed the genome-wide insertional mechanism of transposons and the transduction efficiency of lentiviruses to engineer ES cell models. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC), the putative cells of origin of ES, were engineered to constitutively express EWS-Fli1 accompanied by the inducible expression of a highly active transposase. Upon activation of the former, transposon-mediated mutagenesis will activate oncogenes and inactivate tumor suppressor genes, to mediate transformation of the transduced that can now engraft when implanted in recipient mice. Xenografted tumors are resected and the mice observed for development of distant metastases. Matching primary and metastatic tumors are sequenced to uncover the genes commonly affected by transposition in the two compartments. Pathway-oriented bioinformatic analysis will further reveal candidate metastatic driver genes. Matching of the targeted pathways with drugs will be used to validate the candidates by in vitro and in vivo metastasis assays. Citation Format: Wajih Jawhar, Paul Waterhouse, Rama Khokha, Takeaki Ishii, Robert Turcotte, Nada Jabado, Livia Garzia. Functional genomics of metastatic Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A64.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.276
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→