MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047475154 · doi:10.5530/pj.2020.12.163

A Review on Phaseolus vulgaris Linn

2020· review· en· W3047475154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Devi M Devi, Dhanalakshmi S Dhanalakshmi, GE Thillai Govindarajan, Tanisha BA Tanisha, Talluri Sonalika, Ruth JE Ruth, Avinash T Avinash, C Jethendra Sri, Logeswaran K Logeswaran, M. Ramasamy

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacognosy Journal · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusFabaceaeTraditional medicineBiologyPhytochemistryCropBotanyMedicinal plantsHerbMedicinal herbsAgronomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We usually take food daily to get energy for our daily activities, our food may be vegetables, fruits, meat, etc.Some vegetables and fruit besides providing flavour, smell, taste, to food, they serve as medicinal plant.Medicinal plant is any plant which in one or more of its organs contains substances that helps to synthesis of new drugs.1 Phaseolus vulgaris is one of the most consuming food crop and medicinal plant all around the world as it is popular because of its seed.Its extract has been used for treatment such as for weight reduction.2 In Folk medicine, Beans are said to be used for acne, bladder, burns, cardiac, carminative, depurative, diabetes, diarrhoea, diuretic, dropsy, dysentery, eczema, emollient, hiccups, itch, kidney stone re solvant, rheumatism, sciatica, and tenesmus.3 Phaseolus vulgaris Linn., has an high potential to be used as human and animal food and to be utilized as a pharmacological agent in medicine.In this paper, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of this plant are reviewed and its potential for further investigation, exploitation, and utilization are discussed.Phaseolus vulgaris Linn., are grown in regions as diverse as Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, China, Europe, the United States, and Canada.The leading bean producer and consumer is Latin America, where beans are a traditional, significant food, especially in Brazil, Mexico, the Andean zone, Central America, and the Caribbean (Table 1).4,5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacognosy JournalSame topicNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesFrench-language works237,207