MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047504968 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.005

13. MANAGEMENT OF BRAIN METASTASES FROM SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER USING SRS

2020· article· en· W3047504968 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Koffler, Sirisha Devi Viswanatha, Fatemeh Fekrmandi, Zaker Rana, Michael Schulder, Anuj Goenka

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiosurgeryConventional PCISalvage therapyProphylactic cranial irradiationLung cancerSurgeryProgression-free survivalOverall survivalInternal medicineRadiation therapyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The management of brain metastases in patients with SCLC has become controversial in the MRI era. We examine our institutional experience treating patients with SCLC with stereotactic radiosurgery. We hypothesize that an SRS strategy in well-selected patients with close MRI surveillance will result in acceptable tumor control, and without disproportionate future neurological symptoms associated with intracranial disease. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of high grade neuroendocrine lung cancer who had undergone SRS between 2013 and 2019 were identified and divided into two groups: SRS-primary and SRS-salvage. SRS-primary was defined as patients who, at time of SRS, had not received previous PCI or WBRT. SRS-salvage was defined as patients who had received previous PCI or WBRT. Primary outcome was intracranial progression free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and neurologic symptom free survival (N-SFS), defined as time to development of neurologic symptoms attributed disease. RESULTS Twenty patients were identified with median follow-up of 14.1 months. 11 patients were identified as SRS-primary, 9 as SRS-salvage. Among SRS-primary, median PFS and OS were 6.1 months (range 0.9 – 14.5 months) and 15.6 months (4.1–43.5) respectively. N-SFS was 11.2 months (range 3.6–40.0). 3 of 11 patients developed neurological symptoms attributable to disease. 3 underwent salvage SRS and 2 salvage WBRT. None died from intracranial disease. Among SRS-salvage, median PFS following PCI/WBRT was 9.8 months (range 1.8 – 23.6 months) and OS following salvage SRS 5.5 months (range 1.1 – 27.8 months). 3 of 9 patients developed further brain metastases post-SRS. 1 patient died from intracranial disease. CONCLUSION Among well-selected patients followed with MRI surveillance, our data suggest SRS as primary management of brain metastases from SCLC may be reasonable. Symptomatic intracranial disease was uncommon after SRS, and no patients undergoing upfront SRS died from intracranial disease. Prospective data are required to validate these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207