MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047511422 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.3013612

Design and Analysis of a Bidirectional Hybrid DC Circuit Breaker Using AC Relays With Long Life Time

2020· article· en· W3047511422 on OpenAlexafffund
Ken King Man Siu, Carl Ngai Man Ho, Dong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsCircuit breakerGalvanic isolationReliability (semiconductor)Electrical engineeringEngineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceVoltageTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presented a new hybrid circuit breaker solution for using in dc microgrids. The proposed solution can offer a high-reliability protection feature for the dc microgrid with low conduction loss, bidirectional current flow, and galvanic isolation function. In the design, it is combined with a group of mechanical switches and semiconductors, where the mechanical switches handle the current conduction during normal operation and the semiconductors handle the breaker response during transient operation. The design fully utilizes the advantage of both types of switches and maximizes the performance and life time of the system. Throughout the design, it maintains only one mechanical switch in series with each power line; thereby, the high conductivity of the circuit breaker is maintained. At the same time, through the hybrid design, the electrical stress applied to the mechanical switch is eliminated. Thus, an effective and high-reliability solution is provided for the design of dc circuit breakers. The operation principle is explained in detail and the design guideline is provided. A 150/380 V and 15 A circuit breaker is successfully implemented, and the performance is experimentally verified, which shows good agreement with the theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207