Compact dual band circularly polarized meta‐structured antenna for <scp>GPS</scp> application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this letter, a dual band circularly polarized (CP) meta‐structured antenna is designed by −1 mode for L1 band and mu‐zero resonance mode for L2 band, respectively. The antenna consists of two kinds of unit cells which have four unit elements for −1 mode and mu‐zero resonance mode, respectively, in order to utilize the limited space efficiently, and to maximize the gain. Since two modes of −1 mode and mu‐zero resonance mode operate like as loop antenna, these are fed by magnetic coupling of an aperture, simultaneously. In order to reduce mutual coupling between two modes, the orientation of −1 mode antennas are tilted by 45° from that of MZR mode antennas. In this arrangement, magnetic fields with two directions are needed to excite all unit elements, simultaneously. Thus, a cross shaped asymmetric aperture is employed. The RHCP gain of the antenna is measured to be 0.59 dBic at L1 band and −0.02 dBic at L2 band, respectively. The size of the antenna is only 0.14 λ 0 by 0.14 λ 0 ( kr ground = 1.28) at L2 band. The measured results show a good agreement with those of simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".