MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047645812 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000175

Machine Learning Predicts Prolonged Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Pediatric Severe Influenza

2020· article· en· W3047645812 on OpenAlex
Michaël Sauthier, Philippe Jouvet, Margaret M. Newhams, Adrienne G. Randolph

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsMedicineRespiratory failureHypoxemiaAcute respiratory failureIntensive care medicineLogistic regressionReceiver operating characteristicEmergency medicineInternal medicineMechanical ventilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Influenza virus is a major cause of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Early identification of patients who will suffer severe complications can help stratify patients for clinical trials and plan for resource use in case of pandemic. Objective: We aimed to identify which clinical variables best predict prolonged acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in influenza-infected critically ill children. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was defined using hypoxemia cutoffs from international consensus definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with ventilatory support. Prolonged acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was defined by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure criteria still present at PICU day 7. Derivation Cohort: In this prospective multicenter study across 34 PICUs from November 2009 to April 2018, we included children (< 18 yr) without comorbid risk factors for severe disease. Validation Cohort: We used a Monte Carlo cross validation method with N 2 random train-test splits at a 70–30% proportion per model. Prediction Model: Using clinical data at admission (day 1) and closest to 8 am on PICU day 2, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using random forests machine learning algorithms and logistic regression. Results: We included 258 children (median age = 6.5 yr) and 11 (4.2%) died. By day 2, 65% ( n = 165) had acute hypoxemic respiratory failure dropping to 26% ( n = 67) with prolonged acute hypoxemic respiratory failure by day 7. Those with prolonged acute hypoxemic respiratory failure had a longer ICU stay (16.5 vs 4.0 d; p < 0.001) and higher mortality (13.4% vs 1.0%). A multivariable model using random forests with 10 admission and eight day 2 variables performed best (0.93 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; 95 CI%: 0.90–0.95) where respiratory rate, F io 2 , and pH on day 2 were the most important factors. Conclusions: In this prospective multicentric study, most children with influenza virus–related respiratory failure with prolonged acute hypoxemic respiratory failure can be identified early in their hospital course applying machine learning onto routine clinical data. Further validation is needed prior to bedside implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it