HEAT REJECTION AVOIDANCE IN COMBUSTION ENGINES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat rejection to a cold reservoir is inherent of thermal machines operation. One of them, the engine cycle, aims to deliver liquid power and its efficiency increases directly proportional to the hot reservoir and inversely proportional to the cold reservoir. Most of the studies for increasing engine efficiency leads to increase the hot reservoir. This research instead, instigates the discussion of a better use of energy and heat rejection avoidance on internal some combustion engines systems. It demonstrates the principle that the heat rejection improvement using liquid instead of air ran against the real objective that should have been using it better. The paper shows feasible design steps with physical, energetic and economical approach to implement an engine gas recirculation system, which uses tail pipe gases, through a supersonic Laval nozzle parallel to intake line after charge air cooler. It also purposes waste heat recovery from engine liners as heat source for a Rankine cycle. All calculus and simulations are done based on a real engine data submitted to an European Transient Cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it