Arrival of the rare carbapenemase OXA-204 in Canada causing a multispecies outbreak over 3 years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate a persistent multispecies OXA-204 outbreak occurring simultaneously in multiple distant hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada. METHODS: OXA-204 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolated from multiple hospitals between January 2016 and October 2018 were included in the study. An epidemiological inquiry was conducted in order to elucidate possible transmission routes and a putative source. Isolates were characterized by standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing and by WGS, using Illumina short-read data and MinION long-read data. RESULTS: The outbreak comprised 65 patients and 82 isolates from four hospital sites. Most patients were ≥65 years old, had multiple comorbidities and had received antibiotics recently. The infection to colonization ratio was 1:20. No persistent environmental reservoir was identified. The most frequent organism was Citrobacter freundii (n = 78), followed by Klebsiella spp. (n = 3) and Escherichia coli (n = 1). WGS analysis showed 77/78 C. freundii isolates differing by 0-26 single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Results of WGS analysis showed blaOXA-204 was present on three plasmids types (IncX1, IncA/C2 and IncFII/FIB/A/C2) and on a prophage. All C. freundii isolates harboured multiple copies of blaOXA-204, both on the chromosome and a plasmid. Plasmid IncFII/FIB/A/C2 was observed in all three species. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of OXA-204 plasmids likely occurred between species within the same patient, highlighting the plasticity of these plasmids and potential for widespread dissemination. OXA-204 carbapenemase has been introduced into Quebec and has rapidly disseminated. Although the infection to colonization ratio was low in this outbreak, this carbapenemase has been associated with severe infection elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".