Complications Associated with Low Position versus Good Position Umbilical Venous Catheters in Neonates of ≤32 Weeks' Gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of umbilical venous catheter associated infection (UVCAI) in very preterm infants based on UVC tip position. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, infants born at ≤32 weeks were divided into groups with a UVC tip in either a low-lying or good position. The primary outcome was UVCAI. Survival analysis represented time to infection between groups. Subgroup analyses were based on duration of UVC indwelling time. RESULTS: = 0.001). The risk of infection was higher for UVC of >7 days duration (adjusted HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.2). Extravasation as a complication was significantly higher in the low UVC versus good position UVC (1.3 vs. 0.1%; odds ratio: 14.4, 95% CI: 1.8-119). CONCLUSION: Low-lying UVC was associated with higher risk of infection and extravasation. KEY POINTS: · Low-lying UVC are at higher risk of UVCAI.. · Presence of UVC in situ for > 7 days carries higher risk of UVCAI.. · There was a higher risk of UVC extravasation with low UVCs..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".