MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047760837

Predictors of Weight Change in First-Year Undergraduate Students

2020· dissertation· en· W3047760837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tanmay Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMathematics educationMedical educationMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is a multifactorial and largely preventable condition resulting from complex interactions between different biological and environmental factors. In recent decades, the disease has reached epidemic proportions as over one-third of the global population today is either overweight or obese. Adolescence and young adulthood may be critical periods for obesity development as elevated BMI during these periods have been associated with chronic obesity later in life. As such, young adulthood may be considered a favorable period for effective obesity prevention. Interestingly, while education status is negatively correlated with BMI in the general population from high-income countries, young adults with higher education have been shown to be at greater risk for weight gain than those without a post-secondary education. The “Freshman 15” is a popular theory that suggests that undergraduate students gain 15 pounds during their first year in university. While previous studies have found this to be an exaggerated estimate, they have indicated that, on average, students still tend to gain around 3-5 pounds during this period. Given that young adults pursuing undergraduate studies represent an at-risk group for increased BMI and the development of obesity later in adulthood, the predictors of weight gain in this population must be explored for the development of effective prediction and prevention strategies. This thesis compiles a series of investigations focused on identifying the effect of certain demographic and environmental factors on change in obesity traits among first-year university students from Ontario, Canada. Our investigations confirm the trend of weight gain among students during the first year of university, and implicate ethnicity and type of living arrangement, but not sex, as potential predictors within this context. These results may help promote further research in this area, and ultimately help us have a better understanding of the risk factors that make students susceptible to weight gain during first of university.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207