Performance of SiO <sub>2</sub> -impregnated flax fibre reinforced polymers under wet dry and freeze thaw cycles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flax fibres are of growing interest as a reinforcing fibre; however, they are susceptible to moisture and have demonstrated poor bond to conventional hydrophobic resins. Although there are multiple approaches to address these issues, research has heavily focused on their short-term performance. In this research program, the performance of flax fibre reinforced polymer (FFRP), manufactured using SiO 2 -impregnated flax fibre, is assessed for its short-term performance as well as its long-term performance when exposed to wet-dry (WD) and freeze-thaw (FT) cycles. Treated FFRP showed improved bond between the fibre and resin as well as resistance to fibre pull-out. It exhibited a tensile strength of 144 ± 15 MPa and a tensile modulus of 8.6 ± 0.35 GPa. When exposed to WD cycles, delamination between the fibre and resin were observed. The onset of statistically significant mechanical damage occurred after four WD cycles, with a final 3% reduction in strength and a 6% reduction in modulus post-exposure. When exposed to FT cycles, FFRP experienced cracking within the fibre, as well as delamination at the interface. The onset of statistically significant mechanical damage occurred after 50 FT cycles, which manifested as a final 5% reduction in tensile strength and 10% reduction in tensile modulus post-exposure. Regardless of treatment, FFRP demonstrated the same damage mechanisms as untreated variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".