MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3047839049 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-b61

Abstract B61: Improvement of physical activity training in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors: New specific equation to predict the peak oxygen uptake from the six-minute walk test

2020· article· en· W3047839049 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maxime Caru, Jennifer Labonté, Valerie LeMay, Simon Drouin, Laurence Bertout, Grégor Andelfinger, Nathalie Alos, Maja Krajinović, Caroline Laverdière, Daniel Sinnett, Daniel Curnier

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVO2 maxTest (biology)Generalized estimating equationBlood cancerPhysical therapyStatisticsMathematicsCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is the most widely used test to assess the functional capacity of cancer patients. However, it is reported that the actual equations cannot accurately predict oxygen uptake (VO2 value) or walk distance (6MWD) in cancer survivors. Because of the importance for clinicians and physiologists to have a validated VO2 or 6MWD equation from the 6MWT to observe the predicted survivors’ value, we focused on the validation of a standard and specific equation to predict VO2 peak and 6MWD. Methods: A total of 200 survivors were enrolled in this study, among whom 168 participants underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a 6MWT. They also completed a physical activity questionnaire. Participants were randomly divided in two groups to predict the equations (n=118 (70%)) and to validate them (n=50 (30%)). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine a new prediction equation for VO2 peak and 6MWD from 6MWT. Bland and Altman methods were used to assess the accuracy. Results: Our findings showed that without specific variables in the VO2 peak equation, the mean bias was of 2.67 mL.kg-1.min-1 and of 2.51 mL.kg-1.min-1 with specific variables. We observed a better accuracy compared to previously published equations, which reported a mean bias of 12.09 mL.kg-1.min-1. The same results were observed for the 6MWD. Conclusion: This was the first study to predict VO2 peak and 6MWD using clinical and specific variables related to the disease. Every health care professional and exercise physiologist should use both our validated equations to provide a better adapted physical training. Our findings strengthen the need to evaluate survivors’ cardiorespiratory fitness in the care process. Citation Format: Maxime Caru, Jennifer Labonté, Valérie Lemay, Simon Drouin, Laurence Bertout, Gregor Andelfinger, Nathalie Alos, Maja Krajinovic, Caroline Laverdière, Daniel Sinnett, Daniel Curnier. Improvement of physical activity training in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors: New specific equation to predict the peak oxygen uptake from the six-minute walk test [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B61.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→