MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047949250

CHARACTERIZING DRUG-RESISTANCE IN ADULTS WITH NEW-ONSET EPILEPSY

2020· dissertation· en· W3047949250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alyssa Denton

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyDrug Resistant EpilepsyMedicineDrug resistancePsychologyPsychiatryBiologyGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objectives: There are very few studies reporting the factors involved in or the rate of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in adults with new-onset epilepsy (NOE). This prospective cohort study characterizes DRE and risk factors in a pure adult cohort with NOE or newly diagnosed epilepsy (NDE). There are very few studies reporting the factors involved in or the rate of DRE in adults with NO and NDE. Methods: Patients were selected from a prospective cohort followed between 2011 and 2018 from the Single Seizure Clinic (SSC) in Saskatoon, SK. The SSC sees patients who experience their first seizure and approximately 30% are diagnosed with epilepsy. We identified the following variables and outcomes in the cohort: age, gender, epilepsy type, seizure onset, etiology, epilepsy syndromes, EEG and imaging outcomes, and the rates of DRE. Inclusion criteria included patients with NO and NDE, age 18 years or older at time of diagnosis, and a minimum 1 year of follow‐up. Results: Ninety-five patients were included, 46 females and 49 males. Median age of onset was 33 years. Of those, 20.0% developed DRE between 2011-2018. Average time between onset and DRE diagnosis was 2.32 years. Bivariate analysis identified age, gender, and etiology as important risk factors for DRE, however these variables failed to be significant in the multivariate model. Discussion: A lower percentage of DRE was identified in this cohort of adults compared to any other published study at present. The majority of patients to develop DRE were diagnosed in the first year of follow up, showing the importance of early characterization and treatment. Similarly, a younger age of onset was shown to be a substantial indicator of the prognosis. Despite a small cohort and insignificant statistical outcomes, our findings might guide the directions of future research in this topic. Significance: The specificity of the cohort along with the outcomes identified in this study contribute valuable information about NOE in adults and the development of DRE. This study has laid the groundwork for not only a larger cohort study to be implemented in the future, but also several other studies to evaluate potential predictors such as specific imaging results as a risk factor for DRE and quality of life assessment through follow-up related to DRE risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207