MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048066448 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.8.001

The impact of information technology quality on electronic customer satisfaction in movie industry

2020· article· en· W3048066448 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan, Ribut Basuki, Hotlan Siagian

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCustomer satisfactionBusinessMarketingQuality (philosophy)Advertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of social media becomes a common habit in today's community and routinely used to interact with the community member. Also, many companies used social media to create a social media community concerning the products and services provided to strengthen the company's brand. This study surveys as many as 231 respondents and data analysis uses the PLS method utilizing smart PLS software. The result reveals that the use of information technology that is getting faster with high-speed data accessibility enhances the intensity of interaction between the community member with the path coefficient value of 0.605. Furthermore, the use of information technology with high-speed data accessibility also increase the satisfaction of movie trailer viewers with the path coefficient value of 0.392 since it can provide excitement and entertainment. Besides, the increased use of information technology provides higher satisfaction to the audience. The results also show that the presence of a social media community could provide satisfaction for movie trailer viewers with a coefficient of 0.332. The availability of films in the community provides excellent interactive communication between users. This research has focused only on the use of information technology in the respondents who watch movie trailers and is limited to a region of East Java province, Indonesia. Further research is required to be performed, which focuses on different types of social media and context and needs to analyze the comment of the film viewer in order to provide a better benefit on the latest films and for the entertainment company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207