MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Low-Power Wideband Receiver Front-End for NB-IoT Applications

2020· article· en· W3048098448 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Abbasi, Nakisa Shams, Amin Pourvali Kakhki, Frédéric Nabki

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandComputer scienceInternet of ThingsFront and back endsElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Front (military)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringEmbedded systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-power wideband receiver front-end is proposed for the narrow-band internet of things (NB-IoT) wireless standard to cover frequency bands from 0.6GHz to 1.4GHz. The front-end receiver integrates a programmable gain quadrature RF-to-baseband (BB) current-reuse receiver (CRR) architecture using conventional double-balanced passive-mixer with 25% duty-cycle local oscillator (LO) followed by a passive polyphase filter (PPF), high pass filter (HPF), programmable gain gm-C filter and RC-low pass filter (LPF). Low-power consumption is achieved by employing RF-to-BB CRR that shares a single supply with a wideband transconductor and a transimpedance amplifier (TIA). Moreover, power consumption is reduced by employing a single path PPF and gm-C filter to attenuate the blocker frequency at 7.5MHz above the intermediate frequency (IF). The proposed architecture is post-layout simulated in TSMC 130-nm CMOS technology. It achieves a voltage gain of 59.4dB, a noise figure (NF) of 4.9dB and a out-of-band IIP3 of -34.2dBm at 900MHz while consuming 1.8mW from a 1.2V supply at the maximum gain setting. In addition, the input matching covers several NB-IoT frequency-bands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207