MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048159624 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.025801

Shell-model studies of the astrophysical <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>-process reactions <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>34</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cl</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cl</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>34</mml:mn><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ar</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3048159624 on OpenAlexaff
W. A. Richter, B. A. Brown, R. Longland, C. Wrede, Pavel A. Denissenkov, C. Fry, Falk Herwig, D. Kurtulgil, M. Pignatari, R. Reifarth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaUniversity of HullU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean Research CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNucleosynthesisPresolar grainsProtonThermonuclear fusionExcited stateAtomic physicsNuclear reactionNuclear physicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dust grains condensed in the outflows of presolar classical novae should have been present in the protosolar nebula. Candidates for such presolar nova grains have been found in primitive meteorites and can in principle be identified by their isotopic ratios, but the ratios predicted by state-of-the-art one-dimensional hydrodynamic models are uncertain due to nuclear-physics uncertainties.Purpose: To theoretically calculate the thermonuclear rates and uncertainties of the $^{34}\mathrm{S}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Cl}$ and $^{34g,m}\mathrm{Cl}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Ar}$ reactions and investigate their impacts on the predicted $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ isotopic ratio for presolar nova grains.Method: A shell-model approach in a ($0+1$) $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}$ model space was used to calculate the properties of resonances in the $^{34}\mathrm{S}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Cl}$ and $^{34g,m}\mathrm{Cl}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Ar}$ reactions and their thermonuclear rates. Uncertainties were estimated using a Monte Carlo method. The implications of these rates and their uncertainties on sulfur isotopic nova yields were investigated using a postprocessing nucleosynthesis code. The rates for transitions from the ground state of $^{34}\mathrm{Cl}$ as well as from the isomeric first excited state of $^{34}\mathrm{Cl}$ were explicitly calculated.Results: At energies in the resonance region near the proton-emission threshold, many negative-parity states appear. Energies, spectroscopic factors, and proton-decay widths are reported. The resulting thermonuclear rates are compared with previous determinations.Conclusions: The shell-model calculations alone are sufficient to constrain the variation of the $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ ratios to within about 30%. Uncertainties associated with other reactions must also be considered, but in general we find that the $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ ratios are not a robust diagnostic to clearly identify presolar grains made from nova ejecta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207