MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048159624 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.025801

Shell-model studies of the astrophysical <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>-process reactions <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>34</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cl</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cl</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>34</mml:mn><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ar</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3048159624 on OpenAlexaff
W. A. Richter, B. A. Brown, R. Longland, C. Wrede, Pavel A. Denissenkov, C. Fry, Falk Herwig, D. Kurtulgil, M. Pignatari, R. Reifarth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaUniversity of HullU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean Research CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNucleosynthesisPresolar grainsProtonThermonuclear fusionExcited stateAtomic physicsNuclear reactionNuclear physicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dust grains condensed in the outflows of presolar classical novae should have been present in the protosolar nebula. Candidates for such presolar nova grains have been found in primitive meteorites and can in principle be identified by their isotopic ratios, but the ratios predicted by state-of-the-art one-dimensional hydrodynamic models are uncertain due to nuclear-physics uncertainties.Purpose: To theoretically calculate the thermonuclear rates and uncertainties of the $^{34}\mathrm{S}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Cl}$ and $^{34g,m}\mathrm{Cl}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Ar}$ reactions and investigate their impacts on the predicted $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ isotopic ratio for presolar nova grains.Method: A shell-model approach in a ($0+1$) $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}$ model space was used to calculate the properties of resonances in the $^{34}\mathrm{S}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Cl}$ and $^{34g,m}\mathrm{Cl}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{35}\mathrm{Ar}$ reactions and their thermonuclear rates. Uncertainties were estimated using a Monte Carlo method. The implications of these rates and their uncertainties on sulfur isotopic nova yields were investigated using a postprocessing nucleosynthesis code. The rates for transitions from the ground state of $^{34}\mathrm{Cl}$ as well as from the isomeric first excited state of $^{34}\mathrm{Cl}$ were explicitly calculated.Results: At energies in the resonance region near the proton-emission threshold, many negative-parity states appear. Energies, spectroscopic factors, and proton-decay widths are reported. The resulting thermonuclear rates are compared with previous determinations.Conclusions: The shell-model calculations alone are sufficient to constrain the variation of the $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ ratios to within about 30%. Uncertainties associated with other reactions must also be considered, but in general we find that the $^{34}\mathrm{S}/^{32}\mathrm{S}$ ratios are not a robust diagnostic to clearly identify presolar grains made from nova ejecta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.016
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0150.017
Scholarly communication0.0130.013
Open science0.0190.020
Research integrity0.0150.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3630.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207