Bariatric Surgery‐Induced Changes in Intima‐Media Thickness and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Class 3 Obesity: A 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The impact of weight loss induced by bariatric surgery (BS) and nonsurgical approaches on cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) has not been fully elucidated. We assessed the effects of BS and a nonsurgical approach on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and CVRFs in participants with class 3 obesity. METHODS: A total of 87 participants with obesity (59 women; 46 [37-52] years old; BMI, 43 [40-47]) and 75 controls were recruited; 21 (25%) participants with obesity underwent BS. BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, C-reactive protein, CIMT, and Framingham Risk Score were measured at baseline and at 3-year follow-up. Independent factors for reduction in CIMT were analyzed. The literature on the effects of BS and CIMT was reviewed. RESULTS: After BS, BMI decreased from 45.45 to 27.28 (P < 0.001), and mean CIMT decreased from 0.64 mm (0.56-0.75 mm) to 0.54 mm (0.46-0.65) mm (P < 0.012), equivalent to 0.005 mm/kg of weight lost. At 3-year follow-up, participants who had undergone BS had similar CIMT and CVRFs to the control group. No changes in CVRFs were seen related to the nonsurgical approach. BMI reduction after BS had the strongest independent association with decreased CIMT. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after BS decreases CIMT and CVRFs in middle-aged participants with class 3 obesity, resulting in CIMT similar to that observed in lean participants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".