MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Low-Voltage Low-Power Implantable Telemonitoring System with Application to Endo-Hyperthermia Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

2020· article· en· W3048216803 on OpenAlexaff
Mengye Cai, Kenichi Takahata, Shahriar Mirabbasi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestenosisLow voltageHyperthermiaStentMedicineVoltageCardiologyInternal medicineElectrical engineeringBiomedical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a low-voltage low-power implantable telemonitoring system in the context of a smart stent that uses wireless endo-hyperthermia for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. More specifically, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) is designed and implemented that senses the ambient temperature and wirelessly transmits the sensory information to a nearby hub. A customized “smart” stent is used as an antenna for wireless data and power transfer over the unlicensed industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) 915 MHz and 2.4 GHz bands, respectively. For the prototype design, the ASIC is embedded on the small platform at the end of the custom-made stent that also serves as an antenna and the circuit functions without requiring any off-chip components. The proposed fully integrated solution has the following functionalities: radio-frequency (RF) telemetry, power management unit (RF -to-DC converter and voltage regulation), and temperature sensing. The proof-of-concept prototype ASIC is designed and fabricated in a 0.13-μm CMOS process and has a chip area of 1.56 mm2. The device can detect and response to the temperature variations in the range of 30 to 50 °C. The remote power link is established when the power received by the implantable device is about -8 dBm. The data can be transmitted from the ASIC to an external hub at the power level of -28.38 dBm, with the total power consumption of 109.6 μW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207