MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

E-151 Volumetric analysis of endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage

2020· article· en· W3048285241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guilherme Barros, Ryan T. Kellogg, Jade Keen, Cory Kelly, Abhijit V. Lele, Michael R. Levitt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhageModified Rankin ScaleSurgeryNeurosurgeryDemographicsStroke (engine)Glasgow Coma ScaleIschemic strokeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a neurologically-devastating form of stroke. Minimally-invasive evacuation is increasingly investigated as a primary treatment. Secondary analyses of the MISTIE III (Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation) trial, which used stereotactic catheter drainage, demonstrated promising results among functional outcomes within the surgical arm. A sustained functional outcome advantage was found among patients with less than 15 mL residual clot volume or greater than 70% volume reduction. There is limited research on the effect of post-surgical ICH volumes on functional outcomes for patients specifically undergoing endoscopic evacuations. Objective Our primary objective is to study how the residual volume and percentage volume reduction of ICH after endoscopic evacuation affects the functional outcome of surgical patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all endoscopic ICH evacuations performed between October 2016 and February 2020 by our institution’s cerebrovascular neurosurgery service. Demographics, comorbidities, ICH radiographic characteristics, cardiac status, intra-operative vital signs, medications, post-operative clinical course, and functional outcomes measured as mRS (modified Rankin Scale) were assessed The mRS was assessed at discharge, 30 days, and >90 days. Pre-operative and immediate post-operative CT scans were evaluated. ICH volumes before and after evacuation were manually calculated using the ABC/2 method. Results A total of 32 endoscopic evacuations among 31 patients were performed. The mean post-operative ICH volume was 15.3 mL (15.2), while the mean percentage volume reduction was 72.8% (24.4). There was a trend of lower post-operative ICH volumes correlating with lower mRS at discharge. Final data and analyses will be presented. Conclusion Lower post-operative residual clot volumes correlate with improved functional outcome at discharge in patients undergoing minimally-invasive endoscopic evacuation of ICH. Disclosures G. Barros: None. R. Kellogg: None. J. Keen: None. C. Kelly: None. A. Lele: 1; C; LifeCenter Northwest, Aqueduct Critical Care. L. Kim: 2; C; Microvention, Inc. 4; C; Spi Surgical, Inc. M. Levitt: 1; C; Stryker, Medtronic, Philips Volcano. 2; C; Metis Innovative. 4; C; Synchron, Eloupes, Cerebrotech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207