MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048296234 · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01227

Editorial: The Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Neuroprotection

2020· editorial· en· W3048296234 on OpenAlexaff
Miklós Sántha, Heather D. Durham, László Vı́gh, Chrisostomos Prodromou

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pharmacology · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroprotectionHeat shock proteinShock (circulatory)NeuroscienceMedicinePharmacologyChemistryCell biologyBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Research Topic covers an increasingly important topic on the "Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Neuroprotection".With a growing elderly population and an ever-increasing amount of resources required to treat neurodegeneration, there is a growing demand for solutions.Chaperone systems represent the major pro-survival strategy for cells of living organisms in response to stress.Heat shock proteins are associated with neurological disease because they can suppress or promote the aggregation of misfolded toxic proteins.This Research Topic brings together a number of selected articles that show how diverse heat shock proteins impact on neurodegenerative disease.The review by Webster et al. discusses the role that misfolding, aggregation, and aberrant accumulation of proteins play as a central component in the progression of neurodegenerative disease.While molecular chaperones are normally protective, they can also promote the stabilization of toxic protein aggregates, which can lead to neurodegenerative disease.The authors review the role by which sHsps modulate neurodegenerative disease-relevant protein aggregation.The manuscript by Gracia et al. looks at the therapeutic potential of the Hsp90/Cdc37 interaction in neurodegenerative disease, such as Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's.This article presents evidence that client proteins, and in particular kinases, may be differentially affected when modulating the Hsp90/Cdc37 chaperone system, depending on the strength of their interaction with this chaperone complex.Consequently, this may allow therapeutic intervention by targeting Hsp90/ Cdc37-client protein complexes, which are currently underexplored.The role of heat shock protein's in neuroinflammation is discussed by Dukay et al.Apart from the classical molecular chaperoning of heat shock proteins, they are shown to play a role in neurological disorders by modulating neuronal survival, inflammation, and disease-specific signalling processes.Although the processes of neuro-inflammation are not yet fully understood, the authors explore the existing literature on the inflammatory function of heat-shock-proteins within the central nervous system.Cristofani et al. then investigates the role of HSPB8 on the protein quality control system of cells.This system prevents the deleterious effects of misfolded proteins of which HSPB8 is a component.Elevated levels of HSPB8, activated by misfolded proteins through transcription, contribute to preventing the aggregation of misfolded proteins, facilitate autophagy, and enable the efficient clearance of the misfolded proteins.In conclusion, the Research Topic brings together some important topics showing how heat shock proteins are central to many neurological disease processes and how intervention by modulating

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0110.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PharmacologySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207