Tibial tuberosity ossification predicts reoperation for growth disturbance in distal femoral physeal fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Distal femoral physeal fractures (DFPF) can cause growth disturbance that requires further surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to determine if Tibial Tuberosity Ossification Stage (TTOS) at the time of injury predicts secondary surgery for growth disturbance in patients who have sustained a DFPF. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated all patients who had operative treatment for a DFPF at a single centre over a 17-year period. Regression analysis was performed investigating associations between secondary surgery to treat growth disturbance and TTOS, age, Salter-Harris fracture classification type, mode of fixation or mechanism of injury. RESULTS: In all, 85 consecutive patients were identified. A total of 74 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at time of injury was 13.1 years (2.0 to 17.1). Following fixation, 30 patients (41%) underwent further surgery to treat growth disturbance. Absence of tibial tuberosity fusion to the metaphysis was significantly associated with the need for further surgery (p < 0.001). Odds of requiring secondary surgery after tibial tuberosity fusion to metaphysis (compared with not fused) were 0.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.34). The estimate of the effect of TTOS on reoperation rates did not vary when adjusted for gender, mechanism, fixation and Salter-Harris type. When accounting for age, the odds of any further operation if the tibial tuberosity is fused to the metaphysis (compared with not fused) were 0.28 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.94). CONCLUSION: TTOS at the time of injury is a predictor of further surgery to treat growth disturbance in paediatric distal femoral fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".