„УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ ЗА ПРОМОЦИЯ НА ЗДРАВЕ“ – ПРЕГЛЕД НА РАЗВИТИЕТО И РЕАЛИЗИРАНЕТО НА ИНИЦИАТИВАТА П. Бончева, К. Докова HEALTH PROMOTING UNIVERSITIES – A REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INITIATIVE P.Boncheva, K. Dokova
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Резюме: Концепцията „Университети за промоция на здраве” реализира стратегията на Световната здравна организация за холистичен подход към здравето в системата на висшето образование. Целта ни е да разгледаме развитието и реализирането на инициативата „Университети за промоция на здраве” в международен план. Методи: Извършен е преглед на литературата за периода януари 1995 - януари 2020 г. със следните ключови думи: „университети за промоция на здраве”, „здрави университети”, „мрежи” и „историческо развитие”. Дефинирани са критерии за включване на източниците в обзора. Резултати: Открити са 86 източника, от които 51 отговарят на установените критерии. От зараждането на движението в началото на 1990-те до момента над 300 европейски университета и над 1000 в света са се утвърдили като университети за промоция на здраве. Установихме национални мрежи на УПЗ в 6 Европейски и над 10 държави в Северна и Южна Америка, Азия, Канада, Австралия и Нова Зеландия. Извод: Инициативата се развива успешно и предизвиква нарастващ интерес в глобален мащаб, но не е възприета в стратегията на нито едно българско висше училище. Summary: The concept Health promoting universities implements the World Health Organization's strategy for holistic approach towards health in the higher education system. The aim of this article is to review the development and implementation of the "Health promotion universities" initiative internationally. Methods: A review of the available literature was carried out for the period 1995 - January 2020 with the following key words: health promoting universities, healthy universities, networks, historical development. Inclusion criteria for the sources have been defined. Results: Based on the search 86 sources have been found, 51 of which comply with defines inclusion criteria. More than 300 European universities and more than 1000 higher educational institutions from the world have endorsed the principles of health promoting universities. National networks of health promoting universities exist in 6 European and more than 10 countries in North and South America, Asia, Canada, Australia and New Zealand from the start of the movement. Conclusions:The initiative is developing successfully and is proving a growing interest globally, but has not been adopted in the strategy of any Bulgarian higher education institution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it