Book Review – 2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following publication contains book reviews of these titles:Herodotou, C., Sharples, M. and Scanlon, E. (eds) (2018) Citizen Inquiry: Synthesising Science and Enquiry Learning. London: Routledge, 237 pages ISBN 9781138208698Baxter, J., Callaghan, G., and McAvoy, J. (eds) (2018) Creativity and Critique in Online Learning: Exploring and Examining Innovations in Online Pedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 287 pages ISBN 978-3-030-08668-8Krause, S.D. (2019) More than a Moment, Contextualizing the past, present, and future of MOOCS, Utah: Utah State University Press. 168 pages. ISBN: 9781607327868 (paperback) 9781607327875 (ebook)Rowell, C. (ed) (2019) Social Media in Higher Education: Case Studies, Reflections and Analysis, Cambridge, UK: OpenBook Publishers 304 pages ISBN 9781783746682. Available as an open access book at: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0162Morris, S. M. & Stommel, J. (2019), An Urgency of Teachers: The Work of Critical Digital Pedagogy. Hybrid Pedagogy, Open Access: https://criticaldigitalpedagogy.pressbooks.com/ ISBN 9780692152690.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.448 | 0.423 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".