MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048738220 · doi:10.3968/11629

The Enlightenment of Affective Filter Hypothesis and Risk-Taking on English Learning

2020· article· en· W3048738220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yulan Lin, Yuewu Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyConnotationClass (philosophy)Filter (signal processing)Mathematics educationEnlightenmentAnxietySocial psychologyPedagogyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Affective filter hypothesis reveals that learners with different emotional learning attitudes have different filter capability for language learning input. Learners with positive emotional attitude have a low filter of language learning input, while learners with negative emotional attitudes have a high filter of language learning input. Risk-taking means that the learner dares to take risks. He is not afraid of making mistakes and the unknown situation. The risk taker will seize every opportunity to use learned knowledge into practice, which is a positive emotional attitude. In the meantime, the adventurous students’ affective filter is relatively low.  In actual classroom, teachers usually pay little attention to the emotional state of students, and teachers rarely realize the impact of motivation, self-confidence, anxiety, and risk taking on students’ English learning. More attention is still paid to the training of students’ basic skills. Therefore, this paper first explains the connotation of the affective filter hypothesis and risk-taking. After analyzing and explaining the actual teaching situation and the current situation of students, four suggestions are put forward from the perspectives of teachers and students. Among them, the first three suggestions are for teachers, and the last one is for students. The first suggestion is about teaching methods. Teachers should get rid of the obstacles of traditional teaching methods, use multimedia and other technology to assist teaching and give students more opportunities to speak in class. The second suggestion is about teaching atmosphere. Creating a relaxation and pleasant classroom environment is conducive to reducing students’ anxiety and good for students to take risks. The third suggestion is about self-confidence. In order to build students’ confidence in English learning, teachers should encourage students, discover the highlights of each student and praise students when they make progress. The fourth suggestion is about the significance of affective factors. Students should recognize the role of emotional factors in English learning and adopt effective methods to self-regulate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207