The Greater Himalayan Thrust Belt: Insight Into the Assembly of the Exhumed Himalayan Metamorphic Core, Modi Khola Valley, Central Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Strike‐parallel tectonometamorphic discontinuities within the Himalayan metamorphic core are typically interpreted to reflect thrust‐sense movement. However, there is disagreement on the nature and sense of movement across one such structure in central Nepal. Using an integrated approach, this study characterizes multiple structural breaks in the Modi Khola region. Thermobarometric calculations combined with petrochronological investigation show that rocks across the Sinuwa thrust record similar histories with prograde garnet growth ca. 35 Ma and peak pressures of ~11.0 kbar, anatexis at ca. 28 Ma, and followed by cooling and exhumation between ca. 24 and 15 Ma. Rocks below the structurally lower Bhanuwa fault record similar garnet growth at ca. 35 Ma and pressures of ~11.5 kbar but experienced melting and retrogression after ca. 21 Ma. Finally, rocks in the footwall of the Main Central thrust, the structurally lowest break investigated, record prograde metamorphism ca. 17–13 Ma with peak pressures of ~7.0 kbar. This down‐structural migration of prograde metamorphism, anatexis, and subsequent cooling and exhumation of the footwall is consistent with models of progressive underplating and in‐sequence thrusting. When paired with published cooling ages across the Bhanuwa fault, results from this study are consistent with normal‐sense reactivation of the structure during middle‐late Miocene time. This new data set shows that the final assembly of the Himalayan metamorphic core is a result of progressive deformation and juxtaposition of multiple thrust sheets through a combination of in‐sequence thrusting, out‐of‐sequence thrusting, and normal faulting. We refer to this as the Greater Himalayan thrust belt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".