MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B07: A long noncoding RNA-based genomic classifier identifies a subset of luminal muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with favorable prognosis

2020· article· en· W3048778838 on OpenAlexaff
Joep J. de Jong, Yang Liu, Roland Seiler, A. Gordon Robertson, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Jonathan L. Wright, James J. Douglas, Marc Dall’Era, Simon J. Crabb, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Kim E.M. van Kessel, Elai Davicioni, Yair Lotan, Ellen C. Zwarthoff, Peter C. Black, Joost L. Boormans, Ewan A. Gibb

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer AgencyGenome British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder cancerCystectomySubtypingLong non-coding RNABiologyGene expression profilingTranscriptomeOncologyBioinformaticsCancer researchCancerGene expressionMedicineInternal medicineRNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a heterogeneous disease and gene expression profiling has identified different molecular subtypes, each having distinct biologic and clinicopathologic characteristics. Subtyping MIBC has primarily been messenger RNA (mRNA)-based, although noncoding RNAs, including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), have potential utility in providing additional resolution to current molecular subtyping models. Materials and Methods: The expression profiles of over 6,000 lncRNAs were quantified from whole-transcriptome microarray data of a MIBC patient cohort treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radical cystectomy (N=223). Unsupervised consensus clustering of the most highly variant lncRNAs identified a four-cluster solution, which was further characterized using a panel of MIBC biomarkers, gene signatures, and survival analysis. The four-cluster consensus was validated using the publicly available The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) radical cystectomy cohort (N=405). A single-sample genomic classifier (GC) was trained using ridge-penalized logistic regression and then validated in two independent patient cohorts (N=255 and N=94). Results: In the NAC and TCGA cohorts, survival analysis of a lncRNA-based consensus cluster solution revealed a lncRNA-cluster (LC3) with strikingly good prognosis that was enriched for tumors of the luminal-papillary mRNA subtype. In both cohorts, the luminal-papillary tumors from this cluster (LPL-C3) were clinically less aggressive than other luminal-papillary tumors. Patients having LPL-C3 tumors were younger and had more frequent organ-confined, node-negative disease than other luminal-papillary tumors. LPL-C3 tumors were characterized by enhanced FGFR3 pathway activity, wild-type P53 expression, and robust SHH signaling. In the TCGA cohort, LPL-C3 tumors were also enriched for FGFR3 mutations and depleted for TP53 and RB1 mutations. A GC trained to identify these LPL-C3 patients showed robust performance in two validation cohorts. Conclusions: Using lncRNA expression profiling, we identified a biologically distinct subgroup of luminal-papillary MIBC with less-aggressive molecular characteristics and favorable prognosis. These data suggest that lncRNAs can provide additional information in resolving higher-resolution subtypes for more precise patient management strategies. Citation Format: Joep J. de Jong, Yang Liu, Roland Seiler, A. Gordon Robertson, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Jonathan L. Wright, James Douglas, Marc Dall'Era, Simon J. Crabb, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Kim E.M. van Kessel, Elai Davicioni, Yair Lotan, Ellen C. Zwarthoff, Peter C. Black, Joost L. Boormans, Ewan A. Gibb. A long noncoding RNA-based genomic classifier identifies a subset of luminal muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with favorable prognosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2019 May 18-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(15_Suppl):Abstract nr B07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→