MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048924958 · doi:10.1891/wfccn-d-20-00009

Critical Care Nurses as Frontline Warriors During COVID-19 in Pakistan

2019· article· en· W3048924958 on OpenAlexaff
Shaista Meghani, Nasreen Lalani

Bibliographic record

VenueConnect The World of Critical Care Nursing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLMedicineNursingPersonal protective equipmentPandemicHealth carePopulationAnxietyIsolation (microbiology)MEDLINEWorkplace violenceHarassmentFamily medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Suicide preventionPoison controlEnvironmental healthPsychiatryPsychological interventionPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in several short-term and long-term impacts on the physical, social, and psychological health of every individual globally, especially among frontline workers including nurses working in the critical care settings. In Pakistan, 85,264 confirmed cases have been identified and 1,770 deaths are reported so far. The death rate is 2.0% as compared to Europe (14.6%) and the United States (5.7%) per 100,000 population. Frontline workers are the most vulnerable population during this pandemic. Nearly 440 frontline staff including nurses, doctors, and other health workers have been infected with COVID-19 with 8 confirmed deaths reported in different provinces of Pakistan. These numbers are continuously increasing posing a serious threat for the health and well-being of the healthcare professionals especially nurses working in the critical care settings. Objective: The paper outlines the challenges and experiences of critical care nurses working in acute hospital settings of a low resourced country Pakistan during a pandemic. Methods: Literature search using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed databases, local and international news papers, magazines, websites, international nursing colleagues and personal experiences/insights are included in the paper. Results: Findings include common challenges such as lack of staff, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), limited knowledge regarding standard infection control practices, isolation protocols, lack of administrative support, transportation, accommodation, childcare facility, and so forth. As a result, most nurses are reporting symptoms of fear, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic symptoms, spiritual, and moral distress. Nurses often become targets of violence and harassment by the general public in the Pakistani healthcare system, due to lack of awareness, cultural beliefs, low status/image of nurses, low literacy levels, and poverty. Conclusion: Targeted interventions and policies are needed to maintain safety and protect physical, social, psychological, and spiritual health and well-being of nurses. Health authorities in Pakistan should take the responsibility in creating awareness, providing adequate guidance, and support to enhance nurses' well-being and quality of life during the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.445 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConnect The World of Critical Care NursingSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207