MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049062275 · doi:10.1093/jts/flaa101

<i>Mary Magdalene from the New Testament to the New Age and Beyond</i>. Edited by <scp>Edmondo</scp> F. <scp>Lupieri</scp>

2020· article· en· W3049062275 on OpenAlex
Mary Ann Beavis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGospelWitnessNew TestamentArtClassicsTheologyArt historyHistoryPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book of collected essays is one of several recent publications on Mary Magdalene after a hiatus of about a decade (see also Thierry Murcia, Marie appelée la Magdaléenne. entre traditions et histoire: Ier – VIIIe siècle, Collection Héritage méditerranéen [Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence, 2017]; Mary Ann Beavis and Ally Kateusz, eds., Rediscovering the Marys: Maria, Mariamne, Miriam, Scriptural Traces [London: Routledge, 2020]). It originated in a series of conferences, colloquia, lectures, and a graduate course organized by Edmondo F. Lupieri at Loyola University Chicago. The editor describes the scope of the project this way: ‘Without claiming completeness, but as prospectors mapping land—sometimes already explored and worked, and sometimes uncharted, if not undiscovered—we proceeded to plant our stakes on texts and traditions that cover nearly two millennia, ranging from the New Testament to the New Age and beyond’ (p. 2). The book, divided into three parts and comprising 20 chapters, fits the editor’s description. Part I, ‘New Testament through Antiquity’: ‘The Earliest Magdalene: Varied Portrayals in Early Gospel Narratives’ (Edmondo Lupieri); ‘The Apocryphal Magdalene: Expanding and Limiting Her Importance’ (Trent A. Rogers); ‘The Gnostic Magdalene: Mary as Disciple and Revealer’ (Cambry G. Pardee); ‘The Vine and the Net-Caster: Mandaean and Manichaean Transformations of Mary Magdalene’ (Emiliano Fiori); ‘The Patristic Magdalene: Symbol for the Church and Witness to the Resurrection’ (Amanda Kunder); ‘A Whore from Bethany? A Note on Mary Magdalene in Early Non-Christian Sources’ (Bas van Os); ‘The Magdalene Yesterday and Today in the Gospel of Jesus’s Wife’ (David A. Creech). Part II, ‘The Middle Ages through the Modern Age’: ‘The Cult of Mary Magdalene in the Medieval West’ (Theresa Gross-Diaz); ‘The Magdalene of Medieval Hagiography’ (Seth J. A. Alexander); ‘Suspended between Sacred and Profane: The Iconography of Mary Magdalene from Its Origins to the Fifteenth Century’ (Marcello Mignozzi); ‘The Divided Magdalene: the Three Magdalenes Debate (1517–1519): Between Humanism and Enlightenment’ (Jeffrey M Tripp); ‘The Uncontainable Sexuality of a Penitent Woman: The Magdalene between Baroque and Contemporary Art’ (Jayna Hoffacker). Part III, ‘Contemporary Period’: ‘The Magdalene of Contemporary Biblical Scholarship’ (Teresa J. Calpino); ‘From Disciple to Deviant: The Magdalene in Contemporary Popular Film’ (Erica-Lyn Saccucci); ‘The Magdalene of Internet: New Age, Goddess, and Nature Spiritualities’ (James S. Mastaler); ‘Wife, Queen, Goddess: Mary Magdalene and the New Religious-Spiritual Movements (19th–21st Centuries)’ (Carla Ricci); ‘From Galilee to India: There Is Something about Mary (Magdalene)’ (Pierluigi Piovanelli); ‘Why the Church Needs a Prostitutes’ Saint’ (Mary Setterholm); ‘The Marys in the Contemporary Liturgical Practice of the Mary Magdalene (the) Apostle Catholic Community’ (Jane Via); ‘The Legionaries of Mary Magdalene?’ (Ludovica Eugenio).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it