Heat strain in children during unstructured outdoor physical activity in a continental summer climate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the heat strain experienced by children during unstructured physical activity outdoors in a temperate continental summer climate. Eighteen children (7 girls, 12.1 ± 1.7 years) performed up to 4 h of outdoor free-play (duration: 218 ± 33 min; air temperature of 24.5 ± 3.9°C and relative humidity of 66.2 ± 9.2%). Urine specific gravity (USG) was measured pre- and post-free-play, while body core temperature (Tco, ingestible pill) and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Physiological strain index (PSI) was calculated from Tco and HR (scale: 0 (none) to 10 (very high)). Activity levels were categorized as rest, light, moderate, and vigorous based on the metabolic equivalent of task, estimated from video analysis. Most children were euhydrated pre (78%, USG ≤ 1.020), but not post-free-play (28%, USG ≤ 1.020). Mean and peak Tco, HR, and PSI responses were 37.8 ± 0.3°C and 38.4 ± 0.3°C, 133 ± 14 bpm and 180 ± 12 bpm, and 4.7 ± 1.1 (low) and 7.4 ± 1.0 (high), respectively. All children reached peak Tco≥38.0°C, with seven ≥38.5°C, and the highest at 38.9°C. The children spent 58 ± 15% of free-play engaged in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. During free-play, all of the children performed moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity, which was associated with pronounced elevations in heat strain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".