MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049226310 · doi:10.1002/acr.24416

Do Obesity and Overweight Influence Disease Activity Measures in Axial Spondyloarthritis? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2020· review· en· W3049226310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Augusta Ortolan, Mariagrazia Lorenzin, Mara Felicetti, Roberta Ramonda

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Care & Research · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBASDAIOverweightMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisBody mass indexInternal medicineMeta-analysisObesityPopulationPhysical therapyConfidence intervalDiseasePsoriatic arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether overweight/obesity are associated with higher disease activity measures in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched using key terms corresponding to population (axial SpA patients), exposure (overweight/obesity), and outcome (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]). Predefined inclusion criteria were adult patients with axial SpA, exposure classified according to body mass index (BMI), BASDAI/ASDAS reported for each BMI group, and observational studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies was used for quality check. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool results, which were expressed as the mean difference (MD) in BASDAI and ASDAS between BMI groups, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: A total of 10 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The MD in BASDAI between normal BMI and overweight/obese patients was -0.38 (95% CI -0.56, -0.21; P < 0.0001); the MD in ASDAS between the same groups was -0.19 (95% CI -0.29, -0.09; P < 0.0001). The MD in BASDAI between normal BMI and overweight patients was -0.09 (95% CI -0.33, 0.15; P = 0.45), and the MD between normal BMI and obese patients was -0.78 (95% CI -1.07, -0.48; P < 0.0001). For ASDAS, the MD between normal BMI and overweight patients was -0.02 (95% CI -0.19, 0.15; P = 0.79), and the MD between normal BMI and obese patients was -0.42 (95% CI -0.60, -0.23; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients with axial SpA tend to present higher disease activity scores compared to patients with a normal BMI. This difference seems to be clinically meaningful only for the comparison between obese patients and patients with normal BMI, and more for BASDAI than ASDAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.043
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Care & ResearchSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207