MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049227448 · doi:10.3390/app10165631

Improvement of Heterogeneous Transfer Learning Efficiency by Using Hebbian Learning Principle

2020· article· en· W3049227448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsHebbian theoryTransfer of learningLeabraComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCompetitive learningMachine learningDiscriminative modelUnsupervised learningMulti-task learningLearning ruleConvolutional neural networkInductive transferPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkTask (project management)Robot learningWake-sleep algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transfer learning algorithms have been widely studied for machine learning in recent times. In particular, in image recognition and classification tasks, transfer learning has shown significant benefits, and is getting plenty of attention in the research community. While performing a transfer of knowledge among source and target tasks, homogeneous dataset is not always available, and heterogeneous dataset can be chosen in certain circumstances. In this article, we propose a way of improving transfer learning efficiency, in case of a heterogeneous source and target, by using the Hebbian learning principle, called Hebbian transfer learning (HTL). In computer vision, biologically motivated approaches such as Hebbian learning represent associative learning, where simultaneous activation of brain cells positively affect the increase in synaptic connection strength between the individual cells. The discriminative nature of learning for the search of features in the task of image classification fits well to the techniques, such as the Hebbian learning rule—neurons that fire together wire together. The deep learning models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), are widely used for image classification. In transfer learning, for such models, the connection weights of the learned model should adapt to new target dataset with minimum effort. The discriminative learning rule, such as Hebbian learning, can improve performance of learning by quickly adapting to discriminate between different classes defined by target task. We apply the Hebbian principle as synaptic plasticity in transfer learning for classification of images using a heterogeneous source-target dataset, and compare results with the standard transfer learning case. Experimental results using CIFAR-10 (Canadian Institute for Advanced Research) and CIFAR-100 datasets with various combinations show that the proposed HTL algorithm can improve the performance of transfer learning, especially in the case of a heterogeneous source and target dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it