MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049243775

Дослідження проблем впровадження пунктів Кіотського протоколу на мезо- та макрорівні

2014· article· uk· W3049243775 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ihor Lytsur, A. Hrebenjuk

Bibliographic record

VenueНаукові праці Лісівничої академії наук України · 2014
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKyoto ProtocolSustainable developmentChinaProtocol (science)Greenhouse gasIdeologyBusinessInternational communityPolitical scienceEnvironmental economicsEconomicsLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noted contemporary issues of implementation of the Kyoto Protocol points in the world. Compared to EU requirements on reducing hazardous emissions, and reduce the actual emissions in the past 20 years. The reasons of ineffectiveness of individual provisions of the Kyoto Protocol and its flexible mechanisms ( pollution trading,  joint implementation projects, the mechanisms of clean development), which to some extent indirectly contributed to the inefficient of its proceedings. Defined the problem of existence of the Kyoto Protocol through the official exit from the contract the USA, China, India, Japan, Russia and Canada, the new commitment period under the agreement to participate does not intend to. That is, the share of ratifying the continuation of the contract states account for only 15% of emissions into the atmosphere. However, it is clear that the signature could not be a real tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Causes of ineffectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol deeper and solutions that eliminate lies in different planes. The main prospects for the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol and the fundamental need to change the ideological course of the world due to the need to continue the course of sustainable development. Therefore, this strategy cannot be determined based on the traditional human concepts, stereotypes, it requires the development of new scientific approaches that meet not only current realities, but the prospects for the proposed development. Stated that the community understands and embodies the principles of sustainable development only on a rather high level of development of productive forces and production relations. It was determined that the group of first world countries, the leaders of the modern world of progress, bided according to their own interests the idea of ​​sustainable development, without alternative options for social and economic development. The transition to sustainable development model is related primarily to the degree of economic strength of the state, the reliability of its reproducible patterns, possibilities of forming high and stable domestic consumption and accumulation funds for economic and natural reproduction. Practical implementation of the sustainable development model is to intensify investment and innovation. Therefore, first world countries and are in serious economic, political and social conditions too difficult, if not practically possible to change commodity-oriented economy to innovation, which is at the level of complex and requires knowledge intensive explored. Especially implementation of the concept of sustainable development does not guarantee the rapid growth of the welfare of people instead requires hard work and consolidates the efforts of policy makers, managers, scientists and all progressive people of the state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueНаукові праці Лісівничої академії наук УкраїниSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207