MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049305796 · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3011931

Privacy-Preserving Continuous Data Collection for Predictive Maintenance in Vehicular Fog-Cloud

2020· article· en· W3049305796 on OpenAlexaff
Qinglei Kong, Rongxing Lu, Feng Yin, Shuguang Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersShenzhen Key Laboratory FundNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaSpecial Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPaillier cryptosystemComputer scienceCloud computingScheme (mathematics)Homomorphic encryptionAuthentication (law)Vehicular ad hoc networkComputer securityIntelligent transportation systemCryptosystemEncryptionComputer networkEngineeringWireless ad hoc networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advances of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions in intelligent transportation systems, collected vehicle data can produce insights on emerging vehicular phenomenon, and further contribute to the further improvement of innovative and efficient vehicular systems. Particularly, by leveraging data collected from vehicle sensors and maintenance models constructed from operation and repair history, predictive maintenance aims to detect the anomalies of vehicles and provide early warnings before the occurrence of failure. However, privacy preservation still remains as one of the top concerns for vehicle owners in predictive maintenance, as the sensory data could potentially violate their location and identity privacy. To address this challenge, in this article, we propose a privacy-preserving and verifiable continuous data collection scheme with the intent of predictive maintenance in vehicular fog, which gathers and organizes the sensor data of each individual vehicle on a sliding window basis. Specifically, our proposed scheme exploits the homomorphic Paillier cryptosystem and truncated α-geometric technique to protect the content of each individual piece of sensory data. Meanwhile, our proposed scheme also aggregates and authenticates the collected sensory data reports on a time-series sliding window basis, which achieves the continuous observation of the recently collected vehicular sensory data. Detailed security analysis is carried out to demonstrate the security properties of our proposed scheme, including confidentiality, authentication and privacy preservation. In performance evaluations, we also compare our proposed scheme with a traditional scheme, and our scheme shows great improvement in terms of communication and computation overheads. Furthermore, to show the feasibility of our proposed scheme, we also compare and discuss the expected squared error introduced by the differential privacy mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207