Privacy-Preserving Continuous Data Collection for Predictive Maintenance in Vehicular Fog-Cloud
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advances of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions in intelligent transportation systems, collected vehicle data can produce insights on emerging vehicular phenomenon, and further contribute to the further improvement of innovative and efficient vehicular systems. Particularly, by leveraging data collected from vehicle sensors and maintenance models constructed from operation and repair history, predictive maintenance aims to detect the anomalies of vehicles and provide early warnings before the occurrence of failure. However, privacy preservation still remains as one of the top concerns for vehicle owners in predictive maintenance, as the sensory data could potentially violate their location and identity privacy. To address this challenge, in this article, we propose a privacy-preserving and verifiable continuous data collection scheme with the intent of predictive maintenance in vehicular fog, which gathers and organizes the sensor data of each individual vehicle on a sliding window basis. Specifically, our proposed scheme exploits the homomorphic Paillier cryptosystem and truncated α-geometric technique to protect the content of each individual piece of sensory data. Meanwhile, our proposed scheme also aggregates and authenticates the collected sensory data reports on a time-series sliding window basis, which achieves the continuous observation of the recently collected vehicular sensory data. Detailed security analysis is carried out to demonstrate the security properties of our proposed scheme, including confidentiality, authentication and privacy preservation. In performance evaluations, we also compare our proposed scheme with a traditional scheme, and our scheme shows great improvement in terms of communication and computation overheads. Furthermore, to show the feasibility of our proposed scheme, we also compare and discuss the expected squared error introduced by the differential privacy mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it