MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049611856 · doi:10.1101/2020.07.15.20154237

Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

2020· preprint· en· W3049611856 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas K. Karikari, Andréa L. Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Juan Lantero‐Rodriguez, Anniina Snellman, Marc Suárez‐Calvet, Paramita Saha‐Chaudhuri, Firoza Z Lussier, Hlin Kvartsberg, Tharick A. Pascoal, Ulf Andréasson, Michael Schöll, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on AgingInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenentechNational Institutes of HealthIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierOrionin TutkimussäätiöEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesAlzheimerfondenWeston Brain InstitutePfizerBiogenBioClinicaEuropean CommissionHjärnfondenF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaGun och Bertil Stohnes StiftelseConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementBristol-Myers SquibbU.S. Department of DefenseEli Lilly and CompanyBrightFocus FoundationEmil Aaltosen SäätiöDemensförbundetNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsDementiaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNeuroimagingMedicineBiomarkerCognitive declineCerebrospinal fluidInternal medicinePositron emission tomographyOncologyDiseaseAlzheimer's diseasePathologyPsychologyPsychiatryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Whilst cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau pathologies are accurate for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), their broad implementation in clinical and trial settings are restricted by high cost and limited accessibility. Plasma phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) is a promising blood-based biomarker that is specific for AD, correlates with cerebral Aβ and tau pathology, and predicts future cognitive decline. In this study, we report the performance of p-tau181 in >1,000 individuals from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), including cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia patients characterized by Aβ PET. We confirmed that plasma p-tau181 is increased at the preclinical stage of Alzheimer and further increases in MCI and AD dementia. Individuals clinically classified as AD dementia but having negative Aβ PET scans did not show increased plasma p-tau181. Despite being a multicenter study, plasma p-tau181 demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to identify AD dementia (AUC=85.3%; 95% CI, 81.4%-89.2%), as well as to distinguish between Aβ- and Aβ+ individuals along the Alzheimer’s continuum (AUC=76.9%; 95% CI, 74.0%-79.8%). Higher baseline concentrations of plasma p-tau181 accurately predicted future dementia and performed comparably to the baseline prediction of CSF p-tau181. Longitudinal measurements of plasma p-tau181 revealed low intra-individual variability, which could be of potential benefit in disease-modifying trials seeking a measurable response to a therapeutic target. This study adds significant weight to the growing body of evidence in the use of plasma p-tau181 as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for AD, regardless of clinical stage, which would be of great benefit in clinical practice and a large cost-saving in clinical trial recruitment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207