Primary Localized Amyloidosis of the Intestine: A Pathologist Viewpoint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Localized amyloidosis of the intestine is a rare entity, which can clinically masquerade several conditions such as colitis, polyps, and malignant tumors. This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological features of this entity. METHODS: To evaluate the clinicopathological features of this entity, a comprehensive search of the literature (1960 to 2019) was done using the following keywords: "amyloidosis" and "small intestine" or "duodenum" or "ileum" or "jejunum" or "colon". We identified 756 studies about gastrointestinal amyloidosis. Data were examined for 27 studies about localized intestinal amyloidosis. The clinicopathological features were described. RESULTS: The age at presentation ranged from 29 to 88 years. The male to female ratio was 3:1. The jejunum and sigmoid colon were the most commonly involved sites. Abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction (small intestine), or rectal bleeding (sigmoid region) were the most common clinical presentations. Colonoscopic findings included wall thickening, mucosal ulcerations (small intestine), and tumor-like masses (colon). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentations of localized intestinal amyloidosis depend on the site of the deposition of the amyloid. In most cases, amyloid deposits consisted of light chain protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".