MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3050222560 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.014

15 PAEDIATRIC TUBERCULOSIS MANAGED AT A CANADIAN CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: RELATIONSHIP TO BIRTHPLACE AND TRAVEL HISTORY

2020· article· en· W3050222560 on OpenAlexaffabout
Melanie Elhafid, Shaun K. Morris, Haifa Kourdi, Valerie Waters, Ray Lam, Ian Kitai

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineForeign bornOdds ratioPediatricsConfidence intervalTuberculosisPlace of birthMedical recordDemographyEpidemiologyPopulationSurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There are limited data about the relationship of child’s birthplace, parents’ birthplace, and travel history to paediatric tuberculosis (TB) acquisition and disease phenotype in Canada. Travel history is not routinely collected by public health authorities for cases of TB in Canada. Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the association of paediatric TB acquisition and disease phenotype at a metropolitan Canadian children’s hospital with child’s birthplace, parents’ birth place, and travel history. Design/Methods We reviewed prospectively collected TB clinic data (which include travel histories) and records of patients aged 0-17 years managed for active TB disease at a children’s hospital ambulatory TB clinic between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2018. Results Two hundred and twenty six cases were identified, of which 116 (51%) were Canadian-born and 110 (49%) were foreign born children. Of the Canadian-born cases, only one case had parents who were both Canadian-born. In comparison to foreign-born patients, Canadian-born patients were more likely to have a history of travel to a TB-endemic country (63/104) [61%] versus (25/103) [24%], odds ratio [OR] 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-8.7 p<0.001. Canadian-born patients were also more likely to have a known index case (80/116) [69%] versus foreign-born patients (23/110) [21%], OR 8.4; 95% CI 4.5-15.4, p<0.001. For Canadian-born patients, those without a known index case were more likely to have a history of travel to a TB-endemic country than those with a known index case (28/34) [82%] versus (35/70) [50%], [OR] 4.7 95% CI 1.7-12.7, p=0.02. Compared to Canadian-born patients, foreign-born patients had more extrapulmonary disease (48/109) [44%] versus (19/114) [17%], OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.1-7.3, p <0.001. Conclusion Canadian-born children often acquired TB through contact with an infectious source in Canada. However, travel was likely important in a significant minority of cases, especially in Canadian-born children without a known index case. Post-immigration travel may also have been the source of TB in some foreign-born individuals. This would reduce the effectiveness of screening children for TB infection upon immigration. Strategies to prevent and detect travel-related TB are needed to reduce paediatric TB in areas with high immigration rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→