MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3054172129 · doi:10.2514/6.2020-3667

Optimization of Micro-Gas Turbine Based Hybrid Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems for Small Off-Grid Communities

2020· article· en· W3054172129 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nareg Basmadjian, Sean Yun, Zekai Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringHybrid powerGridEngineeringBattery (electricity)Smart gridTurbineEnergy storagePower (physics)Reliability engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There exists more than 280 communities in Canada that are not connected to North American electric grid due to geographic limitations. This work studies the efficiency gains from an engineering perspective as well as the potential economic benefits from complementing a Micro Gas Turbine (MGT) based micro grid with Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) to form a hybrid energy system to meet the power need, and potentially the heat need, of these geographically isolated communities. A yearly averaged profile of power demand from a typical Canadian household with 5-min resolution was adopted to represent the end users of the micro grid. The Capstone C30 of a nominal power rating of 30 KWe is the base MGT power unit assumed for this study. Considering only one cold start of the MGT per day, it was found that an operating strategy to start the MGT between 8 and 10 am minimizes the size of the battery system with an imposed restriction of operating the MGT above 90 percent of its base load; the minimum engine load requirement is designed to achieve the best system efficiency. The minimum size of the usable storage capacity of the BESS is estimated for meeting the energy storage needs for the aforementioned operating strategy. Finally, the economy of a MGT-based hybrid system is assessed by estimating the unit energy price.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 ForumSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207