MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3056467024 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.023

24 Association of location of intubation procedure and number of tracheal intubation attempts with death or severe neurological injury among very preterm infants

2020· article· en· W3056467024 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anthony Debay, Sharina Patel, Pia Wintermark, Martine Claveau, François Olivier, Marc Beltempo

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntubationIntraventricular hemorrhagePeriventricular leukomalaciaGestational agePediatricsNeonatologyRetrospective cohort studyConfoundingCohortAnesthesiaSurgeryPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The physiological stress induced by tracheal intubation (TI) is associated with increased risk of neurological injury among very preterm infants. The location of TI procedure and number of attempts required may contribute to adverse outcomes. Objectives We aimed to assess the association of location where TI is performed and the number of TI attempts with death and/or severe neurological injury (SNI) among very preterm infants born <33 weeks and intubated in the first 7 days of life. Design/Methods Retrospective cohort study of 442 infants born 23-32 weeks gestation, admitted to a Level 3 NICU 2015-2018 within the first 7 days of life. We excluded infants who were moribund and the ones with a major congenital anomaly. Data was collected from the Canadian Neonatal Network database and chart review. Exposures were location of TI (delivery room [DR] vs. NICU) and number of TI attempts (1 vs. >1) among infants intubated in the first 7 days of life. Primary outcome was death and/or SNI (intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3-4 and/or periventricular leukomalacia). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between exposures and outcomes and adjust for confounders. Results Rate of intubation was 46% (202/442). Rate of death and/or SNI was 2.5% (6/240) among infants never intubated, 12% (13/105) among NICU TI, 32% (31/97) among DR TI, 20% (17/85) among infants with 1 TI attempt and 23% (27/117) among infants with >1 TI attempt. Rate of premedication use for NICU TI was 97% (102/105). Overall, median number of intubation attempts was 1 [IQR 1-2]. Compared to no TI, TI in the NICU (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.39, 95% CI 1.20-10.53) and TI in the DR (AOR 9.28, 95% CI 3.33-29.43) were associated with higher odds of death and/or SNI. DR TI was associated with higher odds of death and/or SNI compared to NICU TI (AOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.23-6.35). Compared to no TI, 1 TI attempt (AOR 5.25, 95% CI 1.93-15.93) and >1 TI attempt (AOR 5.17, 95% CI 1.93-15.69) were associated with higher odds of death and/or SNI. The number of intubation attempts (1 vs. >1) was not associated with death and/or SNI (AOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.47-2.09). Conclusion Intubated infants have higher odds of death and/or SNI. Among intubated infants, DR TI is associated with higher odds of death and/or SNI vs. TI in the NICU with premedication. Optimizing non-invasive ventilation in the DR may help reduce brain injury in preterm infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→