MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3056699651 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.076

77 MANAGEMENT OF PEDIATRIC POST-CONCUSSIVE HEADACHES: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF ABORTIVE THERAPIES USED IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

2020· article· en· W3056699651 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kristen Lambrinakos-Raymond, Brett Burstein, Isabelle Gagnon, Roger Zemek, Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentIbuprofenHeadachesConcussionBolus (digestion)PediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicineInjury preventionSurgeryPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The incidence of children presenting to an Emergency Department (ED) following concussion has increased markedly in recent decades. Headache is the most commonly associated symptom and recent guidelines emphasize the importance of analgesia, yet evidence to inform treatment of post-concussive headache (PCH) is completely lacking. Objectives This study sought to characterize abortive therapies used to treat PCH among physicians in academic pediatric EDs and to determine whether duration of symptoms and/or headache intensity influence treatment strategies. Design/Methods A scenario-based electronic survey was sent to physician members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) database. Participants were asked questions regarding management when presented with cases of an adolescent presenting to the ED with PCH refractory to appropriate doses of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Scenarios differed only by duration of symptoms (48-hours versus 1-month post-injury), as well as headache intensity (moderate versus severe). Descriptive statistics are reported. Results Survey response rate was 63% (n/N=137/219). At 48 hours post-injury, 93% of physicians reported that they would initiate treatment for a headache rated as severe. The most commonly selected medications to treat PCH were metoclopramide (72%), an intravenous bolus of normal saline (47%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDS; 35%). There was wide variability among second line strategies for refractory pain following first-line treatment. When presented with PTH pain rated moderate in severity, 63% of respondents would change their management compared to severe pain, with 66% no longer offering pharmacologic treatment in the ED and most frequently selecting oral NSAIDS (58%) when electing to initiate treatment. Medication selection was unchanged when presented with a patient reporting severe PCH at 1 month compared to 48-hours post-injury. Conclusion Most physicians would treat pediatric PCH in the ED for a patient reporting severe pain, however, pain rated as moderate was less likely to receive abortive treatment. Metoclopramide was the most frequently selected medication for analgesia for severe pain. Future research should aim to establish the efficacy of this and comparative treatments for PTH in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207