Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electronic structure of molecules is routinely assessed using a number of methodologies including Bader's Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) and Weinhold's Natural Bond Orbital/Natural Resonance Theory (NBO/NRT). Previously these methods were applied to the study of isothiirane; however, the results obtained were incongruous with one another: the QTAIM analysis suggested an acyclic structure while NRT indicated a cyclic structure. The previous results assume the NRT description to be correct despite limitations in the analysis, while Foroutan-Nejad et al. (Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10140) employed a multiple molecular graph analysis to resolve the QTAIM discrepancy. In this work, we re-examine the electronic structure of isothiirane, employing a detailed NRT analysis and the catastrophe theory model originally described by Bader for the study of three-membered ring systems; additional analysis is performed using NMR tensor calculations and studying substituent effects. A congruous description of the electronic structure of isothiirane and the substituted versions is achieved using all modes of analysis. These results highlight how the careful application of commonly used methodologies can achieve a unified description of electronic structure. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.390 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".