MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W305831411

Repensando la Formación de los Formadores en Chile

2013· article· es· W305831411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susana Gómez Zuloaga

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios hemisféricos y polares · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa Prueba INICIA es una Evaluacion Diagnostica Nacional para Egresados de Carreras de Pedagogia. Dentro de sus objetivos estan, entregar informacion diagnostica a las Instituciones de Educacion Superior sobre la calidad de la formacion de sus egresados de Pedagogia, proveer informacion a los egresados de carreras de Pedagogia, respecto a los aprendizajes adquiridos en su formacion de pregrado, identificar fortalezas y debilidades de la formacion docente, a fin de orientar el diseno de las politicas publicas para mejorar la formacion inicial docente en Chile y propiciar una mayor valoracion profesional y social de los profesores. Ademas en poco tiempo la prueba Inicia sera obligatoria y habilitante, como ha ocurrido en algunos paises como Corea del Sur, Alemania y una provincia de Canada. La gran interrogante planteada en este articulo, es si Las IES, deberian introducir formas rigurosas de evaluacion del trabajo teorico y practico de los estudiantes de pedagogia, que lleve a una certificacion real de que estan preparados, para determinar el estandar de la formacion recibida por los estudiantes. Especificamente, si los graduados deberian ser evaluados sobre el conocimiento de contenidos y su habilidad para ensenar el curriculo requerido. EnglishThe INICIA Test is a National Diagnostic Evaluation for graduate students of the Teaching Career. One of its main objectives is to provide diagnostic information to High School Students about the quality of training of their graduates of the Pedagogy career. Besides of this, it provides information about their learning process during the pre-graduate studies and it identifies strengths and weaknesses of the teaching training process. This aims at providing orientation on the design of public politics that might improve the initial training process of Teachers in Chile. Furthermore, this test provides information that enhances the value of teachers within the professional and social contours. The INICIA Test will be mandatory and enabiling for teachers in Chile in the short run, as it has happened in South Korea, Germany and a province in Canada. The main question proposed in this article is whether the IES should introduce strict forms of evaluation of the theoretical and practical work of students of Pedagogy which would accurately certify their training formation and the standard learning levels desired. It specifically intends to determine whether the graduate students should be evaluated upon their knowledge of contents as well as their ability to teach the required curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios hemisféricos y polaresSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207