MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3065923855 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024320

Improved precision on the experimental <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> decay branching ratio of the Hoyle state

2020· article· lv· W3065923855 on OpenAlexafffund
T. K. Eriksen, T. Kibédi, M. W. Reed, A. E. Stuchbery, K. J. Cook, A. Akber, B. Alshahrani, A. A. Avaa, K. Banerjee, A. C. Berriman, L. T. Bezzina, L.J. Bignell, J. Buete, I. P. Carter, B. J. Coombes, J. T. H. Dowie, M. Dasgupta, L. J. Evitts, A. B. Garnsworthy, M. S. M. Gerathy, T. J. Gray, D. J. Hinde, T. H. Hoang, S. S. Hota, E. Ideguchi, Peter G. Jones, G. J. Lane, B. P. McCormick, A. J. Mitchell, N. Palalani, T. Palazzo, Margie Ripper, E. C. Simpson, J. Smallcombe, B. M. A. Swinton-Bland, T. Tanaka, T. G. Tornyi, M. de Vries

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAustralian Research CouncilNational Science Foundation, United Arab EmiratesNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateRadiative transferBranching fractionAtomic physicsProtonNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stellar carbon synthesis occurs exclusively via the $3\ensuremath{\alpha}$ process, in which three $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ particles fuse to form $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ in the excited Hoyle state, followed by electromagnetic decay to the ground state. The Hoyle state is above the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ threshold, and the rate of stellar carbon production depends on the radiative width of this state. The radiative width cannot be measured directly, and must instead be deduced by combining three separately measured quantities. One of these quantities is the $E0$ decay branching ratio of the Hoyle state, and the current $10%$ uncertainty on the radiative width stems mainly from the uncertainty on this ratio. The rate of the $3\ensuremath{\alpha}$ process is an important input parameter in astrophysical calculations on stellar evolution, and a high precision is imperative to constrain the possible outcomes of astrophysical models.Purpose: To deduce a new, more precise value for the $E0$ decay branching ratio of the Hoyle state.Method: The $E0$ branching ratio was deduced from a series of pair conversion measurements of the $E0$ and $E2$ transitions depopulating the ${0}_{2}^{+}$ Hoyle state and ${2}_{1}^{+}$ state in $^{12}\mathrm{C}$, respectively. The excited states were populated by the $^{12}\mathrm{C}(p,{p}^{\ensuremath{'}})$ reaction at 10.5 MeV beam energy, and the pairs were detected with the electron-positron pair spectrometer, Super-e, at the Australian National University. The deduced branching ratio required knowledge of the proton population of the two states, as well as the alignment of the ${2}_{1}^{+}$ state in the reaction. For this purpose, proton scattering and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray angular distribution experiments were also performed.Results: An $E0$ branching ratio of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{E0}/\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=8.2(5)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$ was deduced in the current work, and an adopted value of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{E0}/\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=7.6(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$ is recommended based on a weighted average of previous literature values and the new result.Conclusions: The new recommended value for the $E0$ branching ratio is about 14% larger than the previous adopted value of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{E0}/\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=6.7(6)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$, while the uncertainty has been reduced from 9% to 5%. The new result reduces the radiative width, and hence $3\ensuremath{\alpha}$ reaction rate, by 11% relative to the adopted value, and the uncertainty to 6.1%. This reduction in width and increased precision is likely to constrain possible outcomes of astrophysical calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207