MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3068076848 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.015

16 Variability in lumbar punctures and neuroimaging in infants less than 90 days with acute bacterial meningitis at a provincial children’s hospital in Canada

2020· article· en· W3068076848 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephanie Bourne, Briar Findlay, Thomas McLaughlin, Mia Remington

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbar punctureBacterial meningitisMeningitisPediatricsNeuroimagingRetrospective cohort studyLumbarEmergency medicineInternal medicineSurgeryCerebrospinal fluidPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Bacterial meningitis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in infants, necessitating appropriate and timely investigations and treatment. Despite this, there are no current Canadian practice guidelines outlining the recommended management of infants with bacterial meningitis beyond empiric antimicrobial choice. As bacterial meningitis remains one of the most severe infectious diseases managed by general pediatricians, it warrants an attempt at practice standardization. Objectives The purpose of this study is to review and identify variation in the timing and frequency of lumbar punctures (LPs) and the use of neuroimaging for the management of bacterial meningitis for infants less than 90 days of age at BC Children’s & Women’s Hospital (BCCWH). Design/Methods A retrospective chart review at BCCWH identified confirmed, presumed or possible bacterial meningitis in infants less than 90 days of age over a five-year period (2013-2018). Anonymized data was collected from medical charts, de-identified and stored in REDCap. Results Eighty-one patients were included. Fifty-three percent of all patients had a delay in receiving an initial LP. The most common reasons for delays were that the patient was too unstable (42%) or that the first LP attempt was unsuccessful (26%). Forty-six percent of all patients had only one LP while 36% had at least one repeat LP. Most repeat LPs were done within 7 days of diagnosis. Twenty-nine percent of patients had an end of treatment LPs. Of all patients, 80% had neuroimaging. Head ultrasound (US) was the most commonly used imaging modality for both first image (68%) and subsequent images (64%). Seventeen percent of patients received a CT scan and 15% an MRI as their first image. In most cases, there was no clear clinical indication for imaging noted other than a diagnosis of meningitis (44%). Conclusion This retrospective study confirms that there is variability in the management of bacterial meningitis with respect to lumbar punctures and neuroimaging in young infants. The findings demonstrate LPs are commonly delayed, and suggest a need to develop clearly defined criteria for evaluating instability before an initial LP. Furthermore, the findings raise concern regarding the common practice of ordering head ultrasound for meningitis, given lower sensitivity in detecting disease complications and therefore disputed clinical utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicBacterial Infections and Vaccines→French-language works237,207→