MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W306952115

"The Bears Are Plentiful and Frequently Good Camera Subjects": Postcards and the Framing of Interspecies Encounters in the Canadian Rockies

2006· article· en· W306952115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keri Cronin

Bibliographic record

VenueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmFraming (construction)CommodificationDestinationsFavouriteSociologyMedia studiesHistoryTourismArchaeologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following essay considers role of animal imagery on postcards marketed in Canada's Rocky Mountain Parks. These popular souvenir items have helped shape dominant systems of environmental knowledge. Because of this, postcards should be considered in discussions regarding ecological health of region. ********** The Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks have always been one of my favourite vacation destinations. (1) Snapshots and nostalgic memories abound of holidays passed in this particular part of Canada. Each one of these holidays included a trip to local post office to mail postcards to friends and family back home. Until recently I gave little thought to dozens of postcards purchased and sent on these annual vacations. My current research, however, has me wondering about broader environmental and cultural implications of this ritualistic holiday act. A large number of these souvenir items feature images of bears: bears that have become a commodity of the wild. The following discussion considers this commodification as it relates to current environmental and interspecific concerns facing Canada's Rocky Mountain Parks. The study of postcards is, by necessity, an interdisciplinary venture, one that raises questions about role of images and icons in production of discursive systems (Nancy), as well as relationships between written and visual texts (Mitchell). These inexpensive, popular souvenir items have historically been neglected in realm of academic inquiry, and it is only in recent years that scholars have considered how these cultural texts can have meaning beyond realm of personal correspondence; as Annette Pritchard and Nigel Morgan argue, picture postcards are a rich cultural reservoir of popular perceptions of people and places (111). My own critical interest in postcards centres on relationship of image and text; I ask, in particular, how these elements work to shape dominant cultural understandings of and nonhuman world. In recent years, many environmental historians have argued that a perceptual division between ideals of nature and ideals of culture is at root of many current environmental problems (see, e.g., William Cronon; Richard White; Neil Evernden). The notion that nature exists outside of and stands separate from human society and technology presents a challenge for addressing ecological problems in twenty-first century. Not only does this dominant way of thinking mask many environmental tensions, but also it creates a sense of separation between most people's lived experiences and environmental impact of their day-to-day activities. To conceive of nature as existing separately from culture is to deny sense of interconnectedness that affects all forms of life on Earth. As Neil Evernden argues, is [...] nowhere near as independent or as 'given' as we like to suppose (xii). For those concerned with addressing twenty-first century environmental issues, a critical re-thinking of what nature is and means is necessary. In spaces designated as Parks, there exists a specific way of viewing nonhuman world. This particular way of framing and engaging with nonhuman world--what I refer to as National Park Nature--is thoroughly mediated by tourism industry. Park Nature frames landscapes of Jasper and Banff Parks as unspoiled and pristine playgrounds to which one can escape in order to engage in healthy recreational pursuits, gaze upon exotic scenery, and live in harmony (even if only for a few days) with animals who are protected by Park borders. The repetition of visual and textual codes reinforces this position, and goes a long way toward masking very real environmental tensions in these landscapes. Canadian Parks face many of same stresses as other regions of Canadian landscape, stresses that are masked through rhetoric of pristine wilderness so dominant in Park Nature. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosaic (Winnipeg)Same topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207