"The Bears Are Plentiful and Frequently Good Camera Subjects": Postcards and the Framing of Interspecies Encounters in the Canadian Rockies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following essay considers role of animal imagery on postcards marketed in Canada's Rocky Mountain Parks. These popular souvenir items have helped shape dominant systems of environmental knowledge. Because of this, postcards should be considered in discussions regarding ecological health of region. ********** The Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks have always been one of my favourite vacation destinations. (1) Snapshots and nostalgic memories abound of holidays passed in this particular part of Canada. Each one of these holidays included a trip to local post office to mail postcards to friends and family back home. Until recently I gave little thought to dozens of postcards purchased and sent on these annual vacations. My current research, however, has me wondering about broader environmental and cultural implications of this ritualistic holiday act. A large number of these souvenir items feature images of bears: bears that have become a commodity of the wild. The following discussion considers this commodification as it relates to current environmental and interspecific concerns facing Canada's Rocky Mountain Parks. The study of postcards is, by necessity, an interdisciplinary venture, one that raises questions about role of images and icons in production of discursive systems (Nancy), as well as relationships between written and visual texts (Mitchell). These inexpensive, popular souvenir items have historically been neglected in realm of academic inquiry, and it is only in recent years that scholars have considered how these cultural texts can have meaning beyond realm of personal correspondence; as Annette Pritchard and Nigel Morgan argue, picture postcards are a rich cultural reservoir of popular perceptions of people and places (111). My own critical interest in postcards centres on relationship of image and text; I ask, in particular, how these elements work to shape dominant cultural understandings of and nonhuman world. In recent years, many environmental historians have argued that a perceptual division between ideals of nature and ideals of culture is at root of many current environmental problems (see, e.g., William Cronon; Richard White; Neil Evernden). The notion that nature exists outside of and stands separate from human society and technology presents a challenge for addressing ecological problems in twenty-first century. Not only does this dominant way of thinking mask many environmental tensions, but also it creates a sense of separation between most people's lived experiences and environmental impact of their day-to-day activities. To conceive of nature as existing separately from culture is to deny sense of interconnectedness that affects all forms of life on Earth. As Neil Evernden argues, is [...] nowhere near as independent or as 'given' as we like to suppose (xii). For those concerned with addressing twenty-first century environmental issues, a critical re-thinking of what nature is and means is necessary. In spaces designated as Parks, there exists a specific way of viewing nonhuman world. This particular way of framing and engaging with nonhuman world--what I refer to as National Park Nature--is thoroughly mediated by tourism industry. Park Nature frames landscapes of Jasper and Banff Parks as unspoiled and pristine playgrounds to which one can escape in order to engage in healthy recreational pursuits, gaze upon exotic scenery, and live in harmony (even if only for a few days) with animals who are protected by Park borders. The repetition of visual and textual codes reinforces this position, and goes a long way toward masking very real environmental tensions in these landscapes. Canadian Parks face many of same stresses as other regions of Canadian landscape, stresses that are masked through rhetoric of pristine wilderness so dominant in Park Nature. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".