MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3071038699 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abb074

Probing primordial stochastic gravitational wave background with multi-band astrophysical foreground cleaning

2020· article· en· W3071038699 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen Pan, Huan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphPerimeter Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsGravitational wave backgroundGravitational waveDetectorNeutron starEinstein TelescopeCOSMIC cancer databaseAstronomyAstrophysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The primordial stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) carries first-hand messages of early-universe physics, possibly including effects from inflation, preheating, cosmic strings, electroweak symmetry breaking, and etc. However, the astrophysical foreground from compact binaries may mask the SGWB, introducing difficulties in detecting the signal and measuring it accurately. In this paper, we propose a foreground cleaning method taking advantage of gravitational wave observations in other frequency bands. We apply this method to probing the SGWB with space-borne gravitational wave detectors, such as the laser interferometer space antenna (LISA). We find that the spectral density of the LISA-band astrophysical foreground from compact binaries (black holes and neutron stars) can be predicted with percent-level accuracy assuming 10-years’ observations of third-generation GW detectors, e.g., cosmic explorer. While this multi-band method does not apply to binary white dwarfs (BWDs) which usually merger before entering the frequency band of ground-based detectors, we limit our foreground cleaning to frequency higher than ∼5 mHz, where all galactic BWDs can be individually resolved by LISA and the shape of the spectral density of the foreground from extragalactic BWDs can be reconstructed and/or modeled with certain uncertainties. After the foreground cleaning, LISA’s sensitivity to the primordial SGWB will be substantially improved for either two LISA constellations where SGWB can be measured by cross correlating their outputs or only one constellation with three spacecrafts where SGWB can be measured by contrasting the responses of a signal channel and a null channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207