MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3071438254 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.041

42 The Impact of Home Respiratory Support on Developmental Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants

2020· article· en· W3071438254 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lindsay McRae, Emily Kieran, Thuy Mai Luu, Sandesh Shivananda, Anne Synnes

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineGestational agePediatricsBirth weightCohortSepsisNeonatal intensive care unitLow birth weightRespiratory systemCohort studyInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common complication of extreme prematurity and may require prolonged home respiratory support. BPD is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes but the impact of home respiratory support on neurodevelopmental outcomes, rehospitalization rates and association with caregiver sociodemographics is less well studied. Objectives This study examines the impact of home respiratory support on neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants at 18-24 months corrected gestational age. Design/Methods This linked Canadian Neonatal Network and Canadian Neonatal Follow-Up Network (CNFUN) multicenter cohort study of infants born April 1, 2009-December 31, 2016 at <29 weeks’ gestational age assessed at 18-24 months corrected age at a CNFUN site compared significant neurodevelopmental impairment rates, rehospitalization rates and sociodemographics in children with and without home respiratory support using Chi-square and student t-tests. Results Of the 3918 infants, 622 (15.9%) received home respiratory support. As expected, infants on home respiratory support had a lower gestational age (mean 25.5 vs 26.5 weeks, p < 0.01), lower birth weight (mean 781 vs 955 grams, p < 0.01), longer NICU stay (mean 118 vs 76 days, p < 0.01) and more comorbidities: late onset sepsis (35.1% vs 22.9%, p < 0.01), NEC ≥ stage 2 (8.9% vs 5.9%, p = 0.01), grade 3-4 IVH or PVL (12.7% vs 8.4%, p < 0.01) and ROP ≥ grade 3 (28% vs 10.8%, p < 0.01). Infants on home respiratory support had higher significant neurodevelopmental impairment rates defined as Bayley-III motor, cognitive, language scores <70, nonambulatory cerebral palsy (GMFCS ≥ 3), hearing and/or visual impairment rates (Table 1), rehospitalization rates (63.3% vs 29.2%, p < 0.01) and >3 rehospitalizations (19.8% vs 5.0%, p < 0.01). With home respiratory support, fewer families had paid employment and more were on social welfare. Conclusion Children born preterm who are discharged home on respiratory support, compared to those without home support, are more likely to experience neurodevelopmental impairment and rehospitalization, and may have an adverse impact on family income. This is important for discharge planning and follow-up care of these high risk children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→