MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3071865955 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.3017383

An Algorithm for Effective Design and Performance Investigation of Active Cooling System for Required Temperature and Torque of PM Traction Motor

2020· article· en· W3071865955 on OpenAlexaff
Pratik Roy, Alexandre J. Bourgault, Muhammad Towhidi, Pengzhao Song, Ze Li, Shruthi Mukundan, G. W. Rankin, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiphysicsTorqueTraction motorComputer scienceComputational fluid dynamicsMechanical engineeringSolverFinite element methodWater coolingElectric motorAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional mechanical design approach of cooling jackets serves the goal of heat dissipation to keep motor temperature below the maximum allowable limit for thermal protection. However, the desired motor performance cannot be effectively achieved by this approach since it only employs heat transfer mechanism. Therefore, a detailed algorithm is developed to provide a constructive cooling design process to achieve the desired performance of a permanent magnet (PM) traction motor. In the preprocessing stage, a two-way electromagnetic (EM) and thermal co-analysis method is developed for preinvestigation of motor temperature and torque to set the goal for the cooling requirement. In the solver, a shape and size optimization method is utilized to get the optimal cooling design for fulfilling the requirement. Further, a multiphysics finite-element analysis model is developed for structural optimization to ensure safe minimal weight of cooling design for the improvement in torque and power density. In the validation step, unlike using only computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to predict motor temperature, a two-way coupling of EM and CFD model is utilized to ensure the design goals of both torque and temperature for several operating conditions. Finally, the design optimization of a cooling jacket for an interior PM synchronous motor is conducted by implementing this algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207