Estimating the Nonparametric Regression Function by Using Padé Approximation Based on Total Least Squares
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a Padé-type approximation based on truncated total least squares (P – TTLS) and compare it with three commonly used smoothing methods: Penalized spline, Kernel smoothing and smoothing spline methods that have become very powerful smoothing techniques in the nonparametric regression setting. We consider the nonparametric regression model, yi=g(xi)+εi, and discuss how to estimate smooth regression function g where we are unsure of the underlying functional form of g. The Padé approximation provides a linear model with multi-collinearities and errors in all its variables. The P – TTLS method is primarily designed to address these issues, especially for solving error-contaminated systems and ill-conditioned problems. To demonstrate the ability of the method, we conduct Monte Carlo simulations under different conditions and employ a real data example. The outcomes of the experiments show that the fitted curve solved by P – TTLS is superior to and more stable than the benchmarked penalized spline (B – PS), Kernel smoothing (KS) and smoothing spline (SS) techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it