MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W30777844 · doi:10.2196/12204

ANALYSIS AND FIT OF THE FTMW SPECTRUM OF THE TWO-TOP MOLECULE N-METHYLACETAMIDE

2003· article· en· W30777844 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nami Ohashi, Masaharu Fujitake, Jon T. Hougen, R. D. Suenram, F. J. Lovas, Jan Pyka

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About 837 hyperfine components of torsion-rotation transitions in N-methylacetamide $(CH_{3}-NH-C(=O)-CH_{3})$ have been measured between 9.9 and 26.5 GHz using the jet-cooled Fourier transform microwave spectrometer at NIST. The molecule is assumed to have a plane of symmetry at equilibrium, so that a permutation-inversion group $G_{18}$ with the six symmetry classes $A_{1}, A_{2}, E_{1}, E_{2}, E_{3}, E_{4}$ is appropriate. Assignments were carried out primarily with the help of combination differences and computer-calculation guidance. A number of global least-squares fits of the transitions for all these symmetry species were carried out using a recently written two-top internal rotation program, which also includes nuclear quadrupole hyperfine interaction terms. At the time of writing the abstract, our best fit of the total data set, which involves 152 torsion-rotation levels with $J \\leq 8$ and $K \\leq 2$, required 3 hyperfine parameters and 42 torsion, rotation, and torsion-rotation parameters to obtain a root-mean-square residual of 5.7 kHz. This residual is essentially equal to the experimental measurement uncertainty because of the numerous occurrences of partially or completely blended hyperfine components. Aspects of the programming algorithm, which uses a pseudo principal-axis-method, and of the qualitative behavior of the low-barrier two-top energy levels will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealthSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207