Unilateral upper eyelid eversion and kink associated with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Upper lid eversion in adults from non-cicatricial causes is rare. We report a case of upper eyelid eversion secondary to epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC). OBSERVATIONS: A 37 year-old female presented with unilateral upper lid eversion. Known for left upper lid ptosis repair in childhood, the patient presented with seven-day history of severe bilateral conjunctivitis and eversion of her left upper lid three days prior. On exam, she had follicular conjunctivitis, punctate epithelial keratopathy with subepithelial infiltrates and membranes bilaterally, with an everted upper lid tarsus, and swollen and ulcerated palpebral conjunctiva. She received topical and oral prednisone to quickly reduce the inflammation, as well as moxifloxacin drops and lubrication. When the swelling subsided, the tarsus adopted a kinked and everted configuration, and was managed successfully with reversion, pressure patching, shielding and close follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTAMCE: This is the first reported case of upper lid eversion secondary to EKC, likely due to sudden marked inflammation and edema of the posterior lamella caused by the adenoviral infection. This case was successfully managed with conservative therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".